Showing posts with label film review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film review. Show all posts

Friday, January 6, 2012

Melancholia (2011)

So I was going to write about Brazil but then I decided to watch Melancholia late last night, and now I want to write about that instead. (I did enjoy Brazil, but it did not resonate with me enough in any way to write anything worthwhile about it.) Watching it was not necessarily a good choice on my part but my choice was also not surprising considering I do a lot of things in the late hours of the night that impair my already fragile sleep. For example, I often give in to the urge to watch a slasher at eleven pm before a morning exam. In high school, I binged so hard on Lost that I couldn't sleep for days because my poor brain was overdosed with adrenaline, and was trying to figure out how to time travel and escape smoke monsters when all I wanted it to do was to count sheep. The real low point came only a few months ago, however, when, after a night out drinking I crawled into bed and, just before shutting off my computer, caved and clicked the link that advertised "THE TOP TEN MOST DISTURBING SCENES IN CINEMATIC HISTORY!" Not only did I scroll through the entire list, reading each grisly description with a gleeful shudder, but I proceeded to actually find one of the movies on Netflix and watch it. ALL of it. By then, it was three in the morning and I wanted to throw up from what I had seen, but more from the fact that I had seen it. It was so bad that I didn't even want to describe the scene to my friends when they inquired about my sleep-deprived, near-hysterical state the next day.

Anyway. Melancholia wasn't grisly. It was poetic. It was gorgeous, sumptuous, and moving. It was a very thoughtful meditation on the depths of depression and a study on what it means to be in such a state. When asked about his film which is, roughly, about the end of the world, director Lars Von Trier responded that he wanted to show people that a deep depression drastically changes perception. In the film, Kirsten Dunst masterfully (really, guys!) plays Justine, just-married and successful, but slowly overcome by a powerful melancholic depression. Why? It is not entirely clear, but if I had her family I would probably be listless and dead inside, too. Melancholia chronicles Justine's wedding reception and the days and weeks immediately after. Let's just say her groom becomes obsolete before the reception is even over, and a study of Justine and her sister, Claire, and their strained relationship as they face the imminent end of the world ensues.

Anyway. The film is split into two parts (and masterfully organized, I might add), each named for each sister. Before Part 1 begins, the viewer experiences several minutes of a dark and dreamy sequence of character and setting quite reminiscent of the lengthy creation scene in The Tree of Life. The entire sequence is set to Wagner's Prelude to his opera Tristan and Isolde which haunts the viewer throughout the film's length and is a perfect, perhaps not-so-subtle emphasis of Justine's suffering, as the Prelude's minor key and 'Tristan chord' were employed to prolong the feeling of grief and sorrow.


Critics have said that Von Trier's metaphor here--the end of the world and Justine's melancholic depression--is a bit heavy-handed. If they mean to say that it doesn't take a professor of film to understand the connection between the two plots, then they are right. But this 'heavy-handedness' is in no way, shape, or form superfluous. It works. Everything about Melancholia works exquisitely. The cinematography absolutely blew me away. Just look at these images...

I won't write much more about the film because, from the bottom of my at-times melancholic heart, I recommend you see it for yourself.

I've been thinking about death a lot lately. I mean I think about death pretty frequently I guess, and I don't think I'm the only one for whom questions of mortality appear on a near-daily basis. But for some reason lately there has been some drive within me to spend a more-than-average amount of my days meditating on death. Much of it has taken the form of weeping over facebook posts on a deceased person's wall. And not in one case have I actually known the person in question, but I read the posts their friends and family and strangers leave, even years after the event, and it is as if I am reading bits of my own eulogy. Because it hurts everyone the same way and fucks with all of our heads.

Yesterday I spent a few hours with my grandmother. My grandmother is 85 years old, although she appears to be older still. I think this has more than a little to do with the fact that she has been through more than most 85-year-old women, on average. That is a silly generalization to make, but I do believe it is true. Anyway, over tea that I succumbed to in order to avoid eating spoiled dairy products she offered me, she told me, once again, stories of the war. This woman cannot remember the most simple words on a day-to-day basis but as she recalled the scenes of death and annihilation she witnessed as a 13-year-old, as she described how, as a hospital worker at 13, she was responsible for removing the maggots that infested soldiers' wounds due to the ever-growing summer heat, she grimaced and raised a knobby arm upwards, as if to shield her eyes from the sun. It was such a dramatic gesture, and she was committing to it completely unconsciously. Because death is scary!

Not to Justine it isn't. Von Trier's point was to show that in her state, Justine welcomes certain death. She bathes nude in Melancholia's blue, fast-approaching light and scoffs at her sister's wish for some sort of last-minute closure. While everyone else is flitting about, running off in golf carts with their children as if getting a mile south of their current location would save them from a planetary collision, Justine has long since waved her white flag. This is depression. Death as an invitation. Complete surrender. And to anyone who has ever as much as flirted with melancholy, this fate is far, far scarier than death.

If you made it this far in the post, I'm flattered and surprised. Sorry for being so scattered.

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Nuts for Netflix, Episode 2

Tomorrow is the first Thursday of the month, which means museum entrance in Seattle is free. I plan to spend a few solid hours at the SAM. Can't wait! Until then, however, it's pouring outside, so options are limited. helloooo cinema in bed.

Tampopo (1985): Really wonderful movie about the joys of food. It's a hilarious little mix of genres and story lines, and you won't get away without craving a steaming bowl of ramen minutes in. Also, I watched it on some random host website since it isn't available to order on Netflix, and the version I was watching (the ONLY version available out there to my knowledge, except for one dubbed in German) cut the last 15-20 minutes. If you know where I can find this film in its entirety, I will be forever grateful!
Tiny Furniture (2010): Big surprise, I'm drawn to that which reflects my current (here, soon-to-be) state. Tiny Furniture tells the story of a young woman fresh outta some liberal arts college where she majored in film and now has no idea what the fuck to do with her life. She returns to her mom's posh/artsy fartsy apartment to spend the summer warring with her obnoxious little sister, a demeaning hostessing job, and two poor excuses for men. The star is also the writer, and, currently merely 25 years of age, is impressive, real, cellulite-y, and irritating. Stars, they're just like us!
The Big Chill (1983): I can't understand how The Big Chill is so beloved by so many. I found it boring, dumb, and ridiculous. A gaggle of thirtysomething old college friends reunited to mourn a mutual friend's death and we have to watch them roll joints, complain about their spouses, and become impregnated by each other, when really the should just be complaining about their horrible hair. WTF? Maybe when I'm a bored thirtysomething in the 2020s I will feel the need to rewatch this movie and end up loving it, pitying my own little sad life.
Howl's Moving Castle (2004): Beautiful, weep-worthy Alice-in-wonderland ish tale of a mousy 18-year-old girl cursed with the appearance of an old woman by an evil witch. Adventure, love, and heartwarming fantastical creatures ensue.

rewatching:
The Old Lady and the Pigeons (1998): This Sylvain Chomet short is a must-see for just about anyone. If you liked The Triplets of Belleville or anything else by Chomet you have to youtube this. Don't despair if you don't speak French--there's just about no dialogue at all. Watch and be creeped out.

I also started the show 'The Inbetweeners' and made it through four episodes of the first season before sternly deciding I really, really didn't like it. In the first four episodes, They tried to get a laugh out of me not once, but TWICE by physically and/or verbally assaulting disabled people. That's funny? If you want a high school comedy/drama, you're far better off watching 'Freaks and Geeks' or the first two seasons of 'Skins'.

Do you watch 'The Inbetweeners'? If you like it, please tell me what you like about it. I'd be curious to discuss.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Nuts for Netflix

Gawd, Netflix, you've done it again! You've helped me to pass days and days and days with nothing to do and make me feel like I've accomplished something by watching so much television and film.

Recently consumed:
Portlandia, Season One (2011)-- totally freaking excellent. Can't wait for more.
Mallrats (1995)-- generally funny and obnoxious, but bores near the end
The Girls' and Boys' Guide to Getting Down (2011)-- starts off pretty funny but gets old just as quickly. If I want to spend an hour and a half watching abominable young adults snort cocaine and try to score, I'd be a part of the Greek system.
Inglourious Basterds (2009)-- totally freaking excellent. I enjoyed reading people's reviews and comments on rottentomatoes afterwards; it's fun to observe people debate the morality within a Tarantino movie.
up next: Talk to her (2002), Brazil (1985)

In other news, I've cleaned drawers, closets, bookshelves, written letters, napped myself into oblivion, baked earl grey shortbread, and attended enough holiday parties that my midsection is mildly distended (severe understatement) every evening. Fa-la-la-la-fat.

What are you all watching?

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Friday, December 23, 2011

The Artist (2011)


Finally! A thoroughly enjoyable movie-going experience! The Artist is a graceful tribute to the silent movie era, and playfully incorporates the storytelling paradigm of that time while remaining completely fresh and fun. Dujardin and Bejo are perfect for their roles, with expressions so minute and earnest, capable of eliciting any emotional response from the audience. They were also unbearably charismatic, and I particularly enjoyed Dujardin's character's obvious humanity and weakness. I highly recommend seeing it. It's playing at one of Seattle's most adorable movie theaters: the harvard exit.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

A Dangerous Method (2011)

Keira Knightley is a terrible actress. Nothing she does is natural, unless natural is synonymous with severe overacting. Everything she says is said in a forced yelp, and the Russian accent was by far the most embarrassing one I've ever heard. That's about all I have to say about this movie.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Like Crazy (2011) and 'Norwegian Wood'

Sometimes we like to do things that we know will hurt us, but we do them anyway, because the experience is beautiful and necessary, sometimes even inescapable. Luckily, when I refer to this phenomenon in terms of watching certain movies or reading certain books, the repercussions and consequences are far, far minimized compared to when another human being is involved. Sometimes there's just something within us that we have to exorcize in any way possible. Recently I've been taking the relatively un-destructive route and watching movies and reading books that I know will undoubtedly break my heart. But part of me is pulled to these stories because they are real, and as they break my heart they make me feel whole and sane in a way that only relatable art can. There is simply no other way for me to explain the reason for my being so deeply drawn to that which will cause me pain, fleeting or lasting. I've always felt a need to experience the most soaring human emotions first hand, and this is probably why I'm not good at saying 'no' when I probably should. Plus, what sort of life is it, living in a grey muteness?

So I paired, rather unconsciously, Drake Doremus' 2011 film Like Crazy with Haruki Murakami's 1987 novel 'Norwegian Wood'. They were both wonderful and beautiful and heartbreaking. I enjoyed every minute of both works, particularly in combination with one another. In Like Crazy, Yelchin and Jones play Jacob and Anna, respectively, two seniors in college in LA. Anna, a journalism student, is from England, and as she falls in love with Jacob, a design student, she unwisely decides to overstay her visa, putting her future with Jacob in jeopardy, as she is subsequently banned from entering the United States. What ensues is a painful and impressionistic view of the following months, wrought with nostalgia and ache. Jacob and Anna can't reach one another on the phone, they turn to an 'open relationship' (riiiight), they break up, they get back together again, and then they try something most of us in a long-distance relationship, no matter how devoted, have not tried: they get married. Only now, six months stand between the two of them before the latter can join her partner in LA.

Understandably and realistically, shit gets complicated, and despite that living, pulsing love that Anna feels for Jacob and that he feels for her, the love over which they get back together despite months of not speaking over and over again, life ends up coming between the two. Like Crazy ends in the most ambiguous way, just like many of our relationships. You watch it and you say "Yeah, it was like that." And I find that to be a success on the filmmaker's part.


Murakami's novel was deeper, more disturbed, and more contemplative. Toru Watanabe looks back on his college years in Tokyo in the 1960s and relives his relationships with several young women who still have a hold on him so deep that he is brought to jolting nausea as the memories pour back in more than a decade later. Murakami's writing is exquisite, introspective, and everything I wanted it to be as I came to know 19-year-old Toru. Together we looked back on the time we learned that life and death are not so separate after all, the time we learned that not only are life and death not so black and white, but everything between the two; namely, love.

This had seemed to me the simple, logical truth. Life is here, death is over there. I am here, not over there. The night Kizuki died, however, I lost the ability to see death (and life) in such simple terms. Death was not the opposite of life. It was already here, within my being, it had always been here, and no struggle would permit me to forget that.

Saturday, December 17, 2011

Hugo (2011)


You have to be extraordinarily careful making a movie set in Paris these days. You must be acutely aware of cliches to avoid--visual, musical, and spoken. To my dismay, ten minutes into Hugo I knew I'd be disappointed. And I SO wanted to adore it!

But it was much too slow, childish, and sloppy. I was captivated only by the final 20 minutes or so, but even then, it was so unfresh and tired that I felt embarrassed sitting in that dark theater. Embarrassed for Scorcese, I guess. (Not often one gets to utter that phrase.)

But yes, I was sleepy and bored and embarrassed, for as the movie's plot revealed itself as one bursting homage to the history of cinema, Hugo continued to deflate and cheapen itself. The unbearable cliches included goddamn accordion music, the subway/train station musicians gag, the old lady with a teensy obnoxious dog gag, the orphan bit, the wide-eed young girl out for an adventure bit, and the stilted policeman in 'love' (portrayed completely unconvincingly by Sacha Baron Cohen) with the radiant, somehow single and SOMEHOW interested flower lady. And these cliches, folks, just about sum up the entire film. Oh dear. Well, there you have it. I found it to be a vast disappointment, distant and impersonal, the cliche of all Parisian cliches, lacking heart, quirk, and soul.

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Kill Bill, Vol. 1 and Chungking Express

I've been on a bit of a Tarantino kick recently, and it's been fun and perhaps even mildly cathartic. (Does 'mild' even work in a sentence with 'cathartic'?) Never having seen either volume of Kill Bill in its entirety, I decided it was about time. So I recruited a housemate and my fleece blanket behind which to hide and went for it.

It is a testament to the director that one can watch this film, at least 80% of which is comprised of violent fight scenes, and not become bored, desensitized, or overwhelmed. Okay, maybe I did get a bit overwhelmed at times but that's why I had Stefan's left arm and my blanket. In any case, Uma Thurman is so kickass, and, as all viewers before and after me, I was obsessed with the crazy teenage killer girl. The dead eyes!

The soundtrack is killer, as is the expected pastiche of genre. It was a rather unconvincing tale, but I didn't have a second to contemplate the irrationality of it all while I was watching it, which is yet another testament to Tarantino. Other favorite bits: Daryl Hannah's white trench coat embellished with trompe-l'oeil belts and buckles, every scene of Uma Thurman's utter bad-assity.


I was told by a professor that Wong Kar-Wai is the Korean Tarantino. Not sure I see that after watching my first of his films. "Chungking Express" (1994) is fresh and real, impressive, but not consistently engaging. Each half of the film is dedicated to a separate story; both detail the heartbreak two young cops experience after breaking up with a girlfriend. The most engaging and beautiful parts of this film were the scenes in which one of the cops speaks to the inanimate objects in his apartment. This film is beautiful because it shows, simply, instances of people and our yearning to connect with anyone or anything at all, and the lengths to which we go to do so. Certain scenes are unspeakably gorgeous, but I was irritated at times by the all too consciously moving camera. It's impressionistic and ephemeral, and thusly true to life.


Movies I plan to see in theaters over break:
-Hugo (Scorcese + 1930s Paris + animation...!@#$%^&*)
-Shame (sex and psychos. enough said.)
-perhaps $3 showings of The Guard and The Rum Diary (only to show my undying love of JD)
-A Dangerous Method (Cronenberg's new film. What's that you say? I get to poke fun at psychoanalysis AND Keira's pout in the same motion picture? Jackpot.)

Monday, December 5, 2011

An Unlikely Pairing

So these past weeks have been fraught with stress of all sorts. My prescription: tea and movies! I recently watched a couple that are as absurd a pairing as could be, but I did quite enjoy them both and will thus give you a blurb.

Firstly, I watched "Tangled", a recent Disney flick that appropriates the grim story of Rapunzel. I'm usually not into the animated deal, and although I see the epic Pixar movies eventually, I'm never rushing to see them in theaters. Anyway, "Tangled" made its way to the recently added "instant view" flicks and I was in the mood for Disney. Ideally, I wanted to watch Cinderella, but they don't have any of the good ones on instant play. "Tangled" was super cute, as expected. The best character is Maximus, the horse, so that says something about the overall quality of the movie, but whatever. If you're babysitting, or cold and sad in bed, or just want to pass some time, you'll enjoy yourself.

Ok. Then I watched Tarantino's notorious "Pulp Fiction". Being the self-proclaimed movie enthusiast that I am, I felt pretty embarrassed that, as a 21-year-old in 2011, I had never seen the movie all the way through. Now I am shamed no more, and join the cult! It's a freaking fantastic flick, from the soundtrack to the vignette structure to the postmodern content. The violence is extreme and awesome and punctuated and stylized, and "Pulp Fiction" neither lacks anything nor exceeds in anything. It's just all-around wonderful. Samuel L. Jackson and Uma Thurman were definitely my favorite actors, the discussion of the 'royale with cheese' was my favorite dialogue, and the part where Butch kicks rapist ass is my favorite scene. Don't be an embarrassment like I was; watch it.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

The Piano Teacher (2001)


I almost decided against reviewing this film because watching it made me feel so ill that I had to lure myself out of my upset state with wine and Christmas carols, and I thought writing about it might make me feel horrid again. This may sound silly, but I am not joking. Some movies out there are truly, deeply upsetting, and this is one of them. (But the wine and singing helped and now I feel able to cope.)

Before I watch a movie I often check it out on IMDb or rottentomatoes.com to see how it's fared with the critics. I spotted a particular review of "The Piano Teacher" whose writer felt that to watch this movie was to "stare into a gaping wound". I can't say that I don't agree. There are some movies out there that are disturbing and perverse simply for the sake of being disturbing and perverse (you may have happened to read my review of "Incendies" which I totally called out for this very reason). I haven't quite yet decided whether "The Piano Teacher" is one of them, but I am definitely considering it.

This French/Austrian film stars Isabelle Huppert, who, in 2001, is well into her "femme d'une certaine age" phase (what you say in France when you don't want to say "old" or "middle-aged" when referring to a woman). It tells the story of a highly respected piano teacher (played by Huppert) who meets a young fellow and the relationship that develops. I approached this film as a dramatic romance, but was disappointed to find that the only real drama came from shocking the viewer with scenes of extensive sadomasochism.

To make a good film about sadomasochism can't be easy. The only other film I've seen that tackles the subject is "The Secretary" (2002), which I really enjoyed. "The Secretary" and "The Piano Teacher" have common elements: both focus on women who seek men to sate their urge to be dominated. Both women use self-harm and mutilation to cope with complicated, dysfunctional family relationships. For some reason, though, "The Secretary" worked for me, while "The Piano Teacher" didn't. Perhaps my thoughts on the subject will become distilled with more time. For now, my only explanation for my aversion to this film, apart from the glaring violence and abuse it unapologetically depicts, is the ambiguous fate of the heroine. With a plot line so severe, so in-your-face, the final scene felt too 'hands-off' for me, and I feel a bit cheated after being put through the emotional pain of watching what I did. The performances were excellent, however; Huppert was so raw and pained that I had to pause the film four or five times to allow myself to calm down before I could continue. It definitely does not shy away from anything, and does not approach the Euro-trashiness and pretension of "Ma Mere" (also starring Huppert), but apart from disturb me on a basic level, it didn't do a whole lot.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Life in a Day (2011)


Oh, the little pleasures in life. I just love it when I'm scanning the 'flix and something I had wanted to watch months earlier suddenly pops up on my "New to Instant" list. That's how I ended up finally watching "Life in a Day," a unique little movie whose preview I first saw this summer while enjoying a screening for the Seattle International Film Festival.

The idea behind "Life in a Day" is that two directors told the world to send them footage of whatever they pleased--as long as it occurred within the 24-hour span of July 24, 2010. They ended up with upwards of 5,000 hours of footage from 190+ countries (dude, there are only 196 I'm pretty sure...) and after what I can only imagine to be one of the most grueling processes in film history, compiled selected bits and pieces into a loosely-directional piece.

At only 90 minutes, it is not a huge investment, and I would recommend it to most anyone. Some of the pieces are more like vignettes--my favorite was probably about a single Japanese father and his zombie-esque son, but that was mostly due to the fact that he used a fisheye lens which really highlighted the absurdly chaotic, small, and crowded 'apartment' in which the two live. The rest are little snippets. The film strives to cover the major things that arguably make us human, and make us One: What do you love most? What do you fear? What's in your pocket? Overall, the film fulfills its role of the arty, voyeuristic, optimistic little flick and my only major complaint is the last scene. I'm sorry, but it really had me going and then lost me completely on a non-compelling, non-novel final bit. And it does feel a bit like an elongated Kodak commercial. It did, however, remind me to continue to work on being present in everything I do; hell, if footage of an overweight dude in his undies brushing his teeth can make it to hollywood, it must be important.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Crazy Stupid Romantic Comedies

Went to see "Crazy Stupid Love" at the Big Picture in Seattle tonight. Firstly, this theater is fantastic. I remember my mom and I pulling up in front of it when I was about 15 years old, eager to see a movie featured in that summer's international film festival, and being told the theater was 21+. So that was a bummer, and I promptly forgot about it. But thank goodness for the rediscovery! It's a cocktail lounge with temper-pedic seats and bartenders will actually deliver drinks to you mid-way through the movie. It's swanky silly. Definitely feels like stepping into 1920s America.

Right, I was going to write about the movie. Ah, the rom com. We love em, we hate em. I mostly hate em. Or so I thought, but then I decided to take a peek at all-time favorite movies and realized that a couple fit the rom com genre (Amelie, The Princess Bride). Whereas I usually gravitate towards the dram com genre (A Room With A View, Match Point, harold and Maude, Moulin Rouge) I could not deny my penchant for laughs AND romance.

So despite refusing to see anything starring Sandra Bullock and/or hugh Grant (they've got to have been in a movie together by now) for years, I decided I kind of maybe wanted to see this new cute rom com. Also vastly important was the presence of Ryan Gosling, Julianne Moore, and Emma Stone, on all of whom I have vague celebrity crushes. (how grammatically maladroit!)

The acting was good, the wardrobe was incredible (seriously, more than anything this movie made me ache to shop for men's shoes) and the soundtrack cute (although Middle East's "Blood" seems to be getting overused recently). Don't be fooled by the title, there is nothing particularly "crazy" about the movie, so if you're looking for thrills, well, don't. Ryan Gosling's charm and body definitely made the movie, without which it would have been outweighed by the dull, formulaic scenes and structure which burdens it regardless. All in all, it's kind of a hit-AND-miss, so it just depends what you're jonesing for on this particular movie night.